Legislation makes poker political game
01/27/2007
5 px spacer

Poker is a democratic game. Whether you are male or female, young or old, rich or poor, black or white - it makes no difference at the poker table. If you like playing for pennies, thousands, or matchsticks, you can become a student of the game and improve your skill level.

A truly American pastime, it's been enjoyed by presidents, generals, Supreme Court Justices, members of Congress and average citizens for more than 150 years.

Poker can be played at home, in clubs, on cruises and in casinos. And until the United States government began intruding on our right to play poker online, that was accessible also.

Unfortunately, even as public support for poker grows, some over-zealous government officials have decided that, while betting on horse races and buying lottery tickets online is okay, playing poker is not. In October 2006, the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) became law. While not out rightly banning online poker, it makes criminals out of many of the entrepreneurs who bring it to us.

Last week, two of these businessmen, the Canadian founders of NETeller, were arrested, detained and charged with violations of the 1961 Wire Act, the progenitor of the UIEGA. They face 20-year prison sentences if convicted. Reverberations from the arrests have severely curtailed online poker operations in the United States.

Some say that money, being made offshore and not on our soil, is the reason for this crackdown. The obvious answer is regulation. According to an economic analysis, $3.3 billion in incremental federal tax revenue could be raised annually if the government regulated Internet poker. It's been successfully done in the United Kingdom, to the benefit of the gaming sites, the players, and government coffers.

Others say that "morality" is the reason for the screw tightening, and that those who presume to decide what's right and wrong for us to do in the privacy of our homes believe that playing poker on a computer compromises John Q. Citizen's decency. The obvious answer to that is activism.

Visit
www.pokerplayersalliance.org to find out how you can fight back with your vote, your signature, your money, and your mouth.
By Jill Cohen


Archived Poker Stories
- a
- Online legend leads after Day 1 EPT of San Remo
- Online poker hearing scheduled for next week
- Elio Fox wins WSOPE in dominating fashion
- Three reasons why poker is a game of skill
- 2011 WSOP Europe Main Event shatters record
- Tristan Wade wins WSOPE Shootout tournament
- Romanello denied Poker Triple Crown at WSOPE
- Daniel Negreanu reignites feud with Annie Duke
- Phil Hellmuth in search of 12th bracelet at WSOPE
- The 5 most hated people in poker: 2011 edition
- Negreanu speaks frankly about Full Tilt Poker
- AGCC addresses Full Tilt Poker players’ concerns
- Top online poker winners and losers for 2011
- BREAKING NEWS: Full Tilt Poker Sold?
- Full Tilt statement on AGCC license revocation
- Thomas “Kallllle” Pedersen wins 2011 WCOOP
- 2011 PokerStars WCOOP Main Event underway
- Gianetti trumps the field at WPT Malta
- Poker’s top players shine at WPT Malta
   
©2005-2009 Lifeofsports.com All Rights Reserved